I really like the sound on this G3 motorbike video (not mine) with slave camera in use:, but maybe you will find resolution problems in it. What is fantastic for one person isn't necessarily good for another. I think the best solution is for people to take a look Gitup G3 videos from several people before making any decisions, no doubt some will be really good and some will be terrible. Out of interest, what is the huge fuzzy dirty smudge on the left of your Yi 4K+ beach video, maybe from the waterproof case? It's not from the sun since it is in the same place looking both directions down the beach, but it is curved as though it is a lens imperfection. Thanks for the offer, I was considering taking it up until I took a look through some of your videos, I'm not that keen on your colours. You are doing a disservice to the camera. I would be happy to process it properly and upload it to Youtube - I cannot imagine it would look as bad as your uploaded videos.
I suggest you upload an original clip from this Gitup. If that is what the camera produces, then no one should take it seriously. But the videos you uploaded from it are very soft with poor color. And if people are satisfied with digital stabilization and 1080 video, that camera is likely a reasonable alternative. My guess is the 1080 60p video from the cheap camera you are flogging looks comparable to that from the GoPro or Yi.
Gitup ge duo how to#
I gave you a tip on how to improve the YouTube compression, and instead you argue. I don't think so (as I said) I think you are outputting trash and uploading bit-starved videos to Youtube. If it's the camera, then the camera is just trash.
Your videos look awful - they are low resolution. None look as bad (viewed in 1080, just like yours) as the videos you posted. These include videos from scores of cameras, videos mounted on a sports car, videos of people sledding, videos with very high detail etc. Just to see the resolution, not for anything else. I can point you to all of my videos on my YouTube channel, almost none of which are in slow motion. I was trying to be helpful in my last post for you specifically and was not comparing cameras only videos to show you and any interested readers here that your videos are unnecessarily poor in resolution. These are two very different products at very different prices which will sell to very different people, there is no point comparing the very fine details or the details of the YouTube compression quality achieved by each! The one advantage of the Yi 4K+ appears to be the 4K, but not everyone wants 4K, most people don't have 4K monitors or computers capable of processing the video. Not everyone wants to walk across a beach in slow motion, some people want them mounted on motorcycles or on their helmets, some on their surfboards or paragliders, plenty of applications where a separate gimbal is not practical. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make, this is a thread about the Gitup G3 costing $135 and you appear to be trying to convince every reader that they should spend $800 on a Yi 4K+ and separate gimbal stabiliser! However good your $800 system is, people with a budget of $100-200 are not going to go for it and people with a $800 budget are not going to buy the G3, although for some applications several G3s for less money might be a better choice. The ultra-smoothness from the gimbal reduces the required bitrate even further and the far more consistent textures than in my videos make it even easier to compress, and since you uploaded it in 4K it was allocated more bitrate than mine to start with. The difference is that your video is half way to being a still frame, it is in slow motion so requires far less bitrate to look good and with the same bitrate will look better. Or, one trick I have heard is to up-rez from 1080 in post to 4K (since you can't shoot at 4K) as YouTube applies less compression to 4K videos more than proportionally. If it is not the camera, then you should upload a higher bitrate video if you care about resolution.
I am not claiming this difference is due to the cameras. You can just watch the first few frames up through the pan (so there is motion, but only along one axis), if the walking really makes you sick !). But my video (actually none of my scores of videos) on YouTube does not suffer from the really low resolution of yours. Yes, without motion the lower bitrate will be ok.
0 kommentar(er)
